New farming systems research on the Darling Downs is working towards finding the impact of cropping rotations, intensity and nutrient strategies on productivity and sustainability.
CSIRO Agriculture and Food principal research scientist, Dr Lindsay Bell, presented some of the preliminary data from the GRDC-funded project at Incitec Pivot Fertilisers’ Agronomy Community Forum earlier this year in Brisbane.
“Farmers have a whole range of levers at their disposal to influence how efficiently the system can convert rainfall into product and dollars,” Dr Bell said.
“This research is looking at some of the key levers, their impacts on water use efficiency and measurable soil properties like nutrient levels.”
The project is comparing 38 different farming systems, with variations in cropping intensity, crop choice, nutrient application strategies and other interventions such as the use of cover crops or manure.
Dr Bell emphasised that the site at Pampas, east of Toowoomba, was very fertile at establishment, with high soil phosphorus and potassium levels.
Based on the data collected in the first three and a half years, he shared five key insights around crop nutrition with the Agronomy Community.
“We are seeing big differences in the nutrient cycling between different crops in terms of the amounts being accumulated in fallow and the timing of that nitrogen availability,” he said.
Soil tests were taken in April and September 2016 to track soil nitrogen accumulations following wheat, faba beans, chickpeas, field peas and canola grown in 2015.
Soil nitrogen accumulation was much higher after canola and legumes than after wheat.
The soil rapidly offered up 84kg/ha of nitrogen after canola, while only 21kg/ha of nitrogen showed up in the fallow after wheat, in tests taken in April 2016.
By September, the fallow nitrogen accumulation was still significantly higher where field peas and canola had been grown, with 130kg/ha of nitrogen accumulated.
In other crops, faba beans and chickpeas had accumulated approximately 90kg/ha of nitrogen and the fallow following wheat accumulated 60kg/ha of nitrogen.
“This understanding is helpful if you’re designing a system that can capture the nitrogen from crops with a higher rate of nitrogen cycling,” he said.
But it wasn’t all good news from legume crops, with the pulses in the system utilising soil nitrogen before fixing atmospheric nitrogen.
“The nitrogen exported in grain from legumes exceeds that of wheat,” Dr Bell said.
“Any additional nitrogen fixed is often being exported from the system so that we achieved a similar negative nitrogen balance after the pulses to cereal dominated rotations.
“Based on our data, I wouldn’t be banking on any huge nutritional benefit from nitrogen fixation from grain legumes in terms of the long-term system nutrient balance.”
He added that legumes were also likely to be exporting more of other nutrients than expected.
“Grain testing has shown the legumes are removing a lot of phosphorus and potassium,” he said.
For example, in faba beans, 10kg of potassium was removed in every tonne of beans at harvest, which was three times that of wheat. Phosphorus was removed at nearly twice the rate of wheat.
“Quantifying the nutrients removed with the harvest can greatly inform future decision making in terms of replenishing those nutrients,” Dr Bell said.
“The removal rates recorded in legumes in this research are higher than the regional rules of thumb, which goes to show the value of knowing how much is being removed from different paddocks, different crops and in different years.”
He encouraged growers to use grain testing to close the loop on nutrient budgeting.
Incitec Pivot Fertilisers’ sub-tropical farming systems agronomist, Bede O’Mara, has also seen high potassium removal from chickpeas when grain testing his field trials.
“The grain test results showed that one tonne of chickpeas removed 10.7kg of potassium – nearly three times more than one tonne of wheat at 3.7kg,” Mr O’Mara said.
“This will add up for growers if they regularly include chickpeas in the rotation, particularly if they grow it with other higher potassium removal crops such as cotton and high yielding summer grains like sorghum or corn.”
The Nutrient Advantage laboratory offers grain testing along with soil and plant tissue testing to provide answers to growers and their advisers.
The farming systems research is also comparing higher intensity farming systems (e.g. five crops in three years) with lower intensity farming systems (e.g. three crops in three years).
“We’ve added more nitrogen into the high intensity systems, but we haven’t produced a lot more grain in total than the lower intensity ones,” Dr Bell said.
“Yields are higher in the lower intensity systems, because there’s more stored water available for the crops and more nitrogen accumulating in the fallows.”
His final insight came from a comparison of two fertilisation strategies, one designed to support a 90th percentile yield and the other a 50th percentile yield.
“In those systems with a higher fertiliser strategy, we’ve essentially balanced removal with supply so far, but we haven’t seen much in the way of a yield response.
“We are seeing some of the additional nitrogen supplied recovered in subsequent fallows and by future crops, so we can expect to get at least some of that extra nitrogen back.”
He said the farming systems project is showing the value of maintaining a consistent approach which balances nutrition across the whole rotation.
Dr Bell sees similarities with Incitec Pivot Fertilisers’ long-term nutrition research at Colonsay, where nitrogen and phosphorus applied to each crop at 80 kg/ha and 10 kg/ha respectively is keeping the system in nutrient balance after 33 years.