NFF: Improved agvet access vital

Farmers say improved agvet access vital

News
IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED: The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority has been relocated to Armidale, NSW, from its pictured Symonston facility in the ACT. Photo - amcarchitecture.com.au

IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED: The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority has been relocated to Armidale, NSW, from its pictured Symonston facility in the ACT. Photo - amcarchitecture.com.au

Aa

Farmers say there must be improvements to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority as part of the agency's relocation to Armidale.

Aa

FARMERS have put the federal government on notice that it must continue to deliver on much needed reform of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA).

The rebuke follows today’s formal announcement of the APVMA’s relocation to Armidale. 

National Farmers Federation chief executive officer Tony Mahar said there needed to be improvements in the APVMA as a result of this move.

They included decreased timelines for product approvals, renewed investment in Australia for new products, and improved efficiencies in the organisation, he said.

BARNABY sends APVMA to Armidale (CLICK HERE).

“Additional delays in bringing new chemical products to market would be incredibly damaging to Australian farm businesses,” Mr Mahar said.

“We must see continued improvement in the functionality of the APVMA from this move. Funding allocated to regulatory reform must not be diverted to subsidise the relocation.

“The NFF has always been concerned that moving the APVMA would result in a loss of highly specific and skilled regulatory scientists, and damage organisational continuity, which would delay the already difficult registration process for new pesticides and medicines. This can’t be allowed to happen.

“The NFF supports the building of stronger regions. But regional development should be undertaken strategically, as part of an evidence-driven plan to build the entire economy. It is notable that the cost benefit analysis only found modest gains to the Australian economy as a result of the relocation.

“The government has been insistent on the relocation and must now deliver on the positive benefits they envisage, or they will be held accountable for any negative impact on farm businesses.”

Aa

From the front page

Sponsored by